Skip to main content

Recommendations for Entry-Level Learning

To close the preparation gap, talent leaders must invest in intentional interventions. The following models offer a blueprint for replacing the “missing rungs” of the career ladder:

Strategic Learning Programs: Organizations should invest in intensive programs that move beyond functional onboarding to build institutional knowledge regarding core operations, market conditions, and complex decision-making factors. This intentional immersion would serve to replace the incidental exposure of entry-level work with structured, long-term learning, more rapidly accelerating entry-level hires toward the level of an experienced employee who deeply understands the business.

Internal Apprenticeships and Rotational Programs: Consider moving beyond traditional hiring and implement structured internal apprenticeships as a alternative to entry-level roles. These programs should rotate apprentices across various business functions to provide broad-based exposure and reintroduce the cognitive struggle through complex problem solving under senior mentorship. The explicit objective is to cultivate the deep institutional knowledge required to transition the apprentice directly into an “experienced” full-time position upon completion.

Co-Designed Work-Integrated Learning (WIL): To ensure graduates are day-one ready, the traditional boundary between higher education and the workplace should be reduced. By co-designing curriculum and co-op experiences with universities, employers can help prepare students for the human-plus-AI workflows they will encounter in the field. This turns the degree more into a multi-year practical internship, rather than just an abstract or academic-only precursor to work.

AI-Simulated Training Environments: If repetitive work is being automated away, organizations should consider deploying AI-simulated environments to replicate the complexity of those tasks. High-fidelity simulations delivered through modern learning platforms can provide safe spaces for new hires to practice critical decision-making, client management, and problem-solving at scale. Potentially manufacturing the years of experience that automation has removed.

Skills-based Hiring: Organizations should shift to hiring frameworks that prioritize verifiable competencies over static credentials. By utilizing evidence-of-work, -skill, -knowledge portfolios, recruiters can evaluate a candidate’s ability to interpret AI outputs and apply the critical thinking and communication skills required to manage the high-stakes human plus AI workflows of the modern workforce.

Implications for Higher Education

For leaders in higher education, the data reveals a fundamental shift in the “value proposition” of a degree. While the credential itself remains a vital signal of capability—the majority of HR leaders (70%) still view a degree as a key indicator of talent—the contents of that degree are being scrutinized through a new, utilitarian lens.

To remain a primary engine of the talent pipeline, higher education institutions should consider the following pivots:

Embed “Machine Management” into Every Discipline: AI literacy must transition from a standalone technical elective into an integrated competency across all disciplines. Rather than treating AI as the sole province of computer science, institutions should empower students in all fields like nursing, history, and business to direct these technologies and strategically adapt workflows. The goal is a graduate who leverages AI as a sophisticated assistant while maintaining the critical thinking necessary to validate outputs, ensure ethical application, and determine the best
use of the technology.

Skills-Based Transcripting: Institutions should transition from traditional, course-centric transcripts to skills-indexed digital records or Comprehensive Learner Records (CLR). This evolution would provide a verifiable list of specific competencies that directly facilitates skills-based hiring models. By providing a granular map of a student’s demonstrated capabilities, these transcripts could help recruiters more effectively evaluate a graduate’s potential to jump into experienced roles or demonstrate the skillsets to operate in a modern, AI-augmented environment.

The “Evidence-of-Work” Portfolio: To meet the demand for skills-based hiring, programs should move toward portfolio-based assessments that demonstrate a student’s process, not just their final output. Showing how a student used AI to iterate on a project is more valuable to a 2026 recruiter than a perfectly polished final paper.

Prioritize High-Stakes Interpersonal Learning: Since employers report worsening gaps in communication and emotional intelligence (EQ), institutions should double down on synchronous, collaborative, and high-stakes interpersonal experiences (such as oral defenses, live negotiations, and team-based problem solving) that GenAI cannot bypass.

Get the Full Report

To read more about the survey findings and these recommendations, the full report is available to access here.

Download